Old Posts

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Attention All Viewers!!!

Attention everyone!  I have an announcement to make, and here it is:

Have you ever wanted your layout to be displayed on a website, free, for the world to see and learn from?  Have you been having trouble finding inspiration for your projects?  Well, the answer to both questions has arrived.  www.onlinetrainshow.com  is just that, an online train show for people to display their layouts permanently on the web. The idea behind this is to create a large index of layouts from around the world in all scales so that people can learn from the ideas of others.  It is also here to promote the hobby, give news and events, and provide an outlet for modelers to show off their work without leaving their home.

If anyone is interested, please contact me either through the comments below, through my email at: jjw2795@gmail.com, or by submitting an inquiry on the site at www.onlinetrainshow.com.

this is a great chance for people to be creative and display their work.  So please, at least consider.

Thank you everyone, James Willmus

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Wheel Arrangements

Locomotives are the lifeblood of the railroad.  The workhorses which haul all the freight and passenger trains.  Since the very first locomotive was built, people have been striving to create better locomotives.  Locomotives, as the evolved, have had different wheel arrangement's to distribute the weight of the locomotive, and provide traction for hauling the trains.

This perpetual quest to perfect a locomotive has driven the progress of locomotives, from steam to diesel, from switcher to mainline runner, all locomotives have had their hay day being number one in service.

Railroaders have developed an alphabet to naming locomotives based on their wheel arrangements, and so I will go over this today.

The alphabet for steam locomotives goes as follows:


  • 2:  one axle, either powered or idle.
  • 4: two axles, either powered or idle.
  • 6: three axles, usually powered
  • 8: four axles, powered
  • 10:  five axles, powered.
  • a dash indicates a separation of wheel assemblies.


So can you name the following loco, with O being a powered axle, and o being idle?

o-OOO-o
2-   6   -2

It a prairie locomotive, which has one idle axle, then three powered axles, then another idle axle in back.

With that said, here are all of the following combinations in Whyte Notation, which counts wheels, not axles.  How many can you name?

Rigid frame:
oo-O  Jervis
o-O-o Jenny Lind

OO Porter
OO-o Porter
o-OO-o Columbia
oo-OO American
oo-OO-o Atlantic
oo-OO-oo Jubilee

OOO un-named
o-OOO Mogul
o-OOO-o Prairie
oo-OOO Ten Wheeler
oo-OOO-o Pacific
oo-OOO-oo Hudson

OOOO un-named
o-OOOO Consolidation
o-OOOO-o Mikado
o-OOOO-oo Berkshire
oo-OOOO Mastodon
oo-OOOO-o Mountain
oo-OOOO-oo Northern

OOOOO un-named
o-OOOOO Decapod
OOOOO-o Union
o-OOOOO-o Santa Fe
oo-OOOOO-o Overland (or Southern Pacific)
o-OOOOO-oo Texas

OOOOOO Pennsylvania
oo-OOOOOO-o Union Pacific


Articulated:


OOO-OOO Mallet (US style)
o-OOO-OOO-o un-named mallet type
o-OOO-OOO-oo un-named mallet type
oo-OOO-OOO-oo Challenger
o-OOOO-OOOO-o un-named (pre-Yellowstone)
o-OOOO-OOOO-oo Yellowstone
oo-OOOO-OOOO-oo Big Boy

And that concludes most common types of US locomotives.  This wheel arrangement alphabet is also known as the Whyte Notation for locomotives.

Diesel locomotives have a different alphabet, called the AAR, and the characters are described below:


  • 1:  one un-powered axle
  • 2: two un-powered axles
  • 3: three un-powered axles
  • A: one powered axle
  • B: two powered axles
  • C: three powered axles
  • D: four powered axles
  • - :separates trucks, but not whole assemblies
  • +: is a joint on the locomotive meaning articulation where the body spans two or more truck assemblies.
  • ( ): parenthesis symbolize a truck assembly that is contained on its own, but the body of the locomotive overhangs to another truck assembly.  Two sets of parenthesis are separated by a +.
So referring to the Whyte Notation, a "1A-A1"  is basically a, oO-Oo with "o" being an un-powered axle, and "O" being a powered axle.

Below will be a list of various types, with the Whyte Notation translation for simplicity:

1A-A1 oO-Oo
1-D o-OOOO
2-A1A oo-OoO
2-B oo-OO
3-A1A ooo-OoO
A1-1A Oo-oO
A1A-2 OoO-oo
A1A-3 OoO-ooo
A1A-A1A OoO-OoO
A1A-B+B OoO-OO+OO
B OO
B-1 OO-o
B-2 OO-oo
B-A1A OO-OoO
B-B OO-OO
B-2-B OO-oo-OO
B-B-B OO-OO-OO
B+B+B OO+OO+OO
2-B+B-2 oo-OO+OO-oo
2-B+B+B+B-2 oo-OO+OO+OO+OO-oo
B-B+B-B OO-OO+OO-OO
B+B-B+B OO+OO-OO+OO
B-B-B-B OO-OO-OO-OO
B-B+B-B+B-B OO-OO+OO-OO+OO-OO
C OOO
C-B OOO-OO
C-C OOO-OOO
1-C+C-1 o-OOO+OOO-o
2-C+C-2 oo-OOO+OOO-oo
2+C-C+2 oo+OOO-OOO+oo
2-C1+2-C1+B oo-OOOo+oo-OOOo
C-C+C-C OOO-OOO+OOO-OOO
1-D-1 o-OOOO-o
2-D-2 oo-OOOO-o
D-D OOOO-OOOO
2-D+D-2 oo-OOOO+OOOO-oo
B-D+D-B OO-OOOO+OOOO-OO
1B+D+D+B1 oOO+OOOO+OOOO+OOo
(B-B+B-B)+(B-B+B-B) (OO-OO+OO-OO)+(OO-OO+OO-OO)

It is important to keep in mind that the Whyte Notation is not used correctly here.  However, AAR is a bit confusing, and most people know the Whyte Notation, so I have adapted it for use in explaining the locomotive arrangements above.

A third Alphabet is the UIC Notation.  It is used in Europe, and is similar to the AAR Notation.


If anyone here is confused, join the club, I'm confused, and I'm explaining it! But I'll be happy to try and clear things up, so if you're confused, please leave your question in the comments box below.












Friday, April 6, 2012

Part 4. Roadbed Construction

Just like the real railroads, if the track isn't up to par, then your trains won't be either.  The roadbed on a real railroad is the fill dirt, trestles, bridges, track, ballast, and anything associated with the track.  On a model railroad, the track sits not on gravel, but a pathway made smooth either through materials like cork roadbed.  The model track also needs a strong supporting structure, which is usually connected to the bench work in some way.  Using the bench work as a supporting structure gives the track a really stable quality.  But what kind of roadbed goes with the type of construction technique used?

Here is what I have found out, after consulting my old Model Railroader Magazine, Classic Toy Trains, and the Internet about roadbed:

Foam Board Method:

The foam board type of construction uses foam board insulation for the scenery base.  Underneath the foam, there is often times a lattice work of bench work.  The track can be put straight onto the foam, however, more often than not, cork road bed is between the track and foam.  Building foundations (yes are apart of the road bed) support the buildings and keep them level.  This is demonstrated in the diagram below:



Foam and Plaster Cloth Method:

This idea of constructing a railroad was the brainchild of the good people at Woodland Scenic's.  The idea was to substitute lumber for foam for the majority of construction.  The foam would be used as a support for the roadbed, fascia, and scenery.  Then plaster cloth, which is a membrane embedded with plaster, is used to sculpt the scenery. Woodland Scenic's sells everything that is needed, and it is explored in depth on a series of videos by Woodland Scenic's here.  It is an overview on building a layout, Woodland Scenic's style.

Here is the diagram showing the roadbed and bench work:



  • Pink:  backboards or supporting foam boards
  • Light Blue: risers or support for track
  • Peach: lumber or wood base
  • Blue: backdrop
  • White: plaster cloth
  • Scribbles: newspaper wads or similar objects
Paper Shell Scenery  

Paper shell scenery, as a layout construction method, is relatively new.  Therefore, it is going through a trial and error phase.  However, the results in a recent Model Railroader Planning issue, look promising.  The idea behind paper shell scenery is to use heavy paper to create a landscape that is flexible, molds to any landscaping challenge, and creates a pleasing landscape, but I'm getting ahead of myself.  Basically, paper shell scenery can be used like the foam and plaster cloth method above.  The track is supported in the same way, or alternately, by wood as described in the "cookie cutter" construction method below.

Cookie Cutter

Roadbed in the cookie cutter method of layout construction is made using a supporting framework of lumber to form a pathway for track to travel upon. The supporting framework is attached to the bench work, allowing for the track to be anchored solidly.  Furthermore, the lattice, made up of cardboard strips, can easily be attached and weaved into a matrix of supporting cardboard.  The cardboard supports the plaster cloth, which supports the scenery.  This allows for a very light weight layout, that has a very flexible scenery base.  The idea is outlined below:

The lowest portion of peach and white colored shapes represents the bench work.  The gray strip on the top portion is the roadbed for the track.  Structures would also be supported along the track via the raised portion.  Cookie cutter gets its name from cutting out portions of the table top (not shown) to allow the track to move along the surface.  This all-wood design is strong, and can be made very light.

Table Top

Finally, there is the classic table top.  Most people know about this style of construction, and hence, know all about the roadbed used.  I'll cut some time here, and just say that the track is put on top of cork roadbed strips.  Other than that, the track can be supported just about any way described above. 

And here is an overview on roadbed.  I bet you didn't think I could dedicate a section to a seemingly simple step huh?  The next step is explaining power in part five!

Monday, April 2, 2012

Part 3.a. Modular and Sectional

Modular and sectional layouts are not a new idea, or trend; but they do offer some interesting advantages.  Have you ever wanted to move your layout, at any time, to anywhere?  Have you ever wanted to join others in a club, and run trains on one layout created by all of you?  Does your club have no space for a permanent railroad?

If you have said, "yes", to any of these questions, you might want to think about a modular or sectional layout.
Sectional/ Modular
A modular layout consists of identical modules, with strict track standards.  This might sound a bit to restricted, but these standards are important to giving a layout a modular design.  the whole point is to be able to connect with Fred's module, Lucy's module, or John's module, or a combination of any of the three.  Because of these standards, the modules can interconnect.

In this diagram, you can see how a modular layout is supposed to work.  Let's say your module is the green on top.  That green module can take the place of any other module there.


A sectional design also allows people to form large layouts, but each section of the layout has its own place, where it will fit.  For instance, a club can create a sectional layout because each member of the club has their own section to work on, and each club member knows who they will be setting up with at a show.  During the show, the layout is operated by everyone in the club, or by only a few people.  The down side to this is that EVERY ONE'S section must be present, or the layout can not be completed.

In this diagram, you can see a sectional layout.  each member of the group owns their own  set of sections, shown by different colors.  All the sections must be there at the meet in order of the train layout to be completed.

Some groups, or individuals, have combined the two.  These people do this by having the connections between each members set of modules (which on the diagram above would be between two colors) is standardized, but the space between two modules owned by the same person are not, making the whole section free to have any track arrangement desired.

Organizations and standards


Modular layouts have a set of standards which they have to meet in order for the module to connect with others.  Below is the NMRA standards for modules:

http://www.nmra.org/standards/modules/ms_intro.htm

These standards might be adapted depending on the area you live.  If you are wanting to connect with a local club, please check out their own standards.

In the sectional area, there are many different types of regulations and standards.  however, one thing that I have seen more often than not are regulations adapted from Free-mo and Fremo standards.

Free-mo is taking the idea of the end modules needing to connect, in any arrangement, while letting the space between two end modules be a free-form style with no regulations.  So a person getting into Free-mo would need to have one, or a series of sections bolted together.  the two ends which would connect to other sections is standardized, but between the two ends, they could have a yard, a big industry, or a junction, or basically anything in between.

You can check out the standards here:

http://www.free-mo.org/standard

Fremo is slightly different, and you can see it here:

http://www.america-n.de/Norm/americaN-standard.pdf


And there you have it, detail about modular groups.


Sunday, April 1, 2012

Part 3, Model Railroad Benchwork

So far in this series, we have gone over planning for a model railroad.  Planning is fun and all, but breaking out the tools and getting to work on the bench work is a great feeling.  In a sense, when the first part of the bench work go up, it is a milestone for the layout; where the layout goes from dream to reality.  Bench work is also a very broad topic, and just about every layout has its own style of bench work.  However, because of this, explaining bench work fully is a hard job for anyone.  This is part of the reason I am going over several methods, to explain the variety of bench work types more clearly.

Also, each method of layout construction that I am going over has its own bench work type, or a modification of a type of bench work.  With that said, let me start explaining:

As stated above, each chosen method of layout construction that I will be covering has its own unique bench work type, but what kinds of bench work are there?

Essentially, all bench work has several things in common: a surface to attach the track, scenery, and wiring, legs, or a place for legs, and a surface for attaching fascia/ backdrops.

Also, from looking at many magazines, books, and websites, I have noticed that there are three primary types of bench work: the table top, the open grid, and the modular.  all three are shown below:

The upper left is the open grid design.  The open grid design works on the idea that the track, and scenery can be sculpted by wood and plaster to make a realistic scenery base.  I have found that this method works best for mountainous terrain, where there is a big difference in vertical height.  The reason why this style of bench work works best for vertical scenery, is because the open grid can have things attach to it that will support scenery.  This also helps make the layout light weight.  The layout construction styles that work best for this type of bench work is:  the cookie cutter, the foam and plaster, and the paper shell methods.

The upper right diagram shows and example of table top bench work.  Table top bench work takes a piece of material, usually a piece of plywood, but also foam board, serve as a layout base.  This style of bench work works best for the following:  table top (duh), and the foam board method.  I have also built layouts that have a table top to them, and use a modified cookie cutter style of construction, where the plywood surface serves as the support for the track bed, rather than the braces.

And finally, the bottom part shows an example of modular, or sectional bench work.  The difference between sectional and modular is that modular allows for sections to be put anywhere on the layout, in any combination.  Sectional bench work is more like a puzzle, where each piece has its own place.  Regardless of Whether the layout is sectional or modular, the main focus is on weight and portability.  Though I have built a sectional layout with the table top bench work style, most layouts of this type use a modification of the cookie cutter, and the foam and plaster construction methods.

So now that we have the confusion of what type of bench work goes with what type of scenery base, I can now explain in detail each type of bench work.

Open Grid


I have no real life examples of the open grid, so instead I'll include a series of diagrams.

Essentially, there are two parts to this bench work: the grid lattice, and the leg assemblies.  The grid lattice is basically a bunch or 1X4's  or 1X3's built to the following pattern:

The diagram on the left is the top view, looking down.  There are runners, as I call them, that go the length of the layout.  Then there are the trusses, which go from one runner to the other.  these trusses support the whole  scenery base as shown in the lower right view.  This view, is demonstrating the process of the foam and plaster construction method.

The upper right view shows how the legs and trusses are attached to the runners.  There are scres, or bolts going from: the truss into the leg, the runner into the truss, and the runner into the leg.  This forms a very sturdy joint, which when used throughout the layout, will give the surface very rugged, sturdy support.  I wouldn't go dancing on it, but it will be quite stable.

Shelf layouts can also be built using this method of construction.  The shelf brackets can attach to a truss that has been reinforced, or is made with thicker wood.  That way, the layout's weight won't strip the joints with the weight of the scenery base.  This method of bench work construction also will give any layout a lighter weight than if made any other way.

Table Top


This style of bench work uses a top on the grid, reinforcing the sub structure and giving a modeler a nice canvas to create his or her model railroad empire.  I have some real life examples below:

 Here is a layout I had seen at a train show a while back.  the whole layout was about 2X5 feet, and was nothing more than a piece of 2" thick foam on an open grid bench work.  It operated quite well.
 One of my cousins had gotten his first train set, and wanted to set it up.  So I helped him and together we created a literal table top layout.  some drywall was used to go between the two coffee tables.
 This is a layout which never got anywhere. is was going to be a GN15 layout, built on nothing more than plywood.
 The South Dakota State Railroad Museum layout is a table top design in the classic sense.  It has reinforced plywood with foam on top.  The draw back to this design is that the layout is very heavy.  But fortunately, we don't need to move it very often.
My own home layout was built on a 2" piece of foam.  as you can see, the foam allows the scenery to be more than North Dakota flat, and allows for rivers, mountains, and valleys to be sculpted.  The only draw back here is that the foam is very messy.


As you can see, there are many ways to build a table top layout.  It figures because this style of layout is the first ever used, and has gone through many changes through the years.  Aside from the table top surface, these layouts are built similarly to the open grid layouts.  For a shelf layout design, this can be made practical, but the weight can become too much.

Modular or Sectional


Modular layouts are used by clubs, and individuals across the country who travel to train shows.  They are made to be, light weight, portable, and rugged.  My old club in Minnesota used a table top variation that gave each section the look of a cart.  The "carts" would hold the scenery base, and allowed for storage underneath.  Unfortunately, this idea does require a trailer, unless you only have two or three sections.

NMRA has standards for modular layouts, and you can look them up, here: http://www.nmra.org/standards/modules/ms_intro.html

Sectional layouts is the other branch of this style of bench work.  Both O scale layouts I have are sectional, and for good reason.  Sectional layouts allow for a large layout to be built, ad operated; then it also allows the layout to be moved to a different place.  Sectional layouts do require certain sections to be present, such as curve sections, or a yard ladder.  This means that X number of sections are required for the layout to work.

My latest O scale layout combated this problem by the use of standards of the track.
 Her is one of the sections, from the underside.  The frame serves the purpose of supporting the ply wood, and transferring the weight down to the legs, which would stick out at us from this angle.
 In order to makes sure that the track would line up, I put both sections together and then screwed the track down.
 The two sections were connected by two bolts.  Later I found that the middle sags a bit, so I added a fifth leg to the primary module, which hosts the power supply and track wiring.
 The legs were bolted to the inside frame, and believe it or not, the layout was quite sturdy on its own.

If I were to extend the layout and add more sections, I would build the new sections from the ground up, between the two end sections which would allow for the track to be measured and made secure, while still being in line. with the other track on the already built sections.

As you can see, there are several ways to build bench work.  I'm sure that many of you are creative, and will modify the bench work types discussed here.  as long as it is sturdy, it will work.  Just remember that, if nothing else.